< back
to full article list
< back
to academic authors article list < back
to textbook authors article list
Find
your own voice
By Dave Harris

Dave Harris
|
Academic writing
is about finding new information and new ways of seeing problems. The
dissertation, the Master's thesis, and, in fact, most, if not all, works
for publication, are works whose value lies in finding innovative ways
of looking at and understanding problems.
The place to start
is by writing down what you know and what you suspect. If you want to
get your written project done sooner than later, start writing now,
and start by writing down your ideas. The sooner your own ideas are
on paper, the sooner you can begin to reflect on your position, and
see how to build it as an academic argument.
The first step in
finding your own voice is to identify, as clearly as possible, what
you think. How do you see the world? And what questions do you have
about it?
Very often, I work
with people who believe, for one reason or another, that they need to
do more research, and that they don't know enough to write a good dissertation.
And sure, who has read everything available on a subject? Most of us
don't have time to track down and read everything relevant to our topic.
There is a problem
with continual reading: it is the absorption of the voices of others.
With each new article and book we read, we find a new voice to follow,
new ideas to try to absorb. Unless we are making a specific concerted
effort to incorporate each new piece of research into our own coherent
worldview, it is easy to end up following each new author. Or at the
least reacting to someone else's view, rather than refining our own.
Until we try to
put them down in words, our philosophies, beliefs and perspectives have
an unresolved and undefined quality. Maybe our thoughts have never been
formulated in words, or maybe the words we've used are different than
the language we speak or write, but until we put our thoughts down in
words on the page, we have not begun to develop our own voice.
My own experience
of writing, even of writing a short essay, is that I don't know what
I want to say. I have ideas; I have a general aim, some intention belief
or interest that I want to capture on the page, a goal. But as I write,
I learn. The ideas shift; some work well on paper, others not so well.
The very choices of words and phrasing often alter how I understand
a project.
This is why I write
multiple drafts. It is not because the first draft is necessarily bad;
it is because in writing the first draft I have learned how to do it
better. And so I start with a fresh page with a new clearer vision of
where I'm going.
This clearer vision
of where I'm going then guides my research efforts. I read with purpose;
with a sense of what I'm looking for. My research is no longer simply
aimless exploration of a territory, it becomes a process of testing
perspectives; in particular it is a process of testing my own vision
to see its strengths and weaknesses. My research ceases to be a piecemeal
set of responses to the work of others, and becomes a process of developing
new ideas and perspectives. Thus the process of writing, and of finding
our own voice, can actually help us with the entire project, including
the research, which we may be using as an excuse to keep from writing.
Dave Harris,
Ph.D., academic writing coach and editor, helps writers rework their
writing process, fine-tune their final drafts, and everything in between
(www.thoughtclearing.com; dave@thoughtclearing.com).
Copyright © 2007, Dave Harris. All rights reserved
|