< back
to full article list
< back
to academic authors article list < back
to textbook authors article list
Using
scholarly models for academic writing
By Dave Harris

Dave Harris
|
Writing is about
finding your own voice and sharing that voice with others. In an apparent
contradiction, using models and imitating work can be a good way to
accomplish this.
I'm not, of course,
talking about simple imitation, or worse, plagiarism: the models are
not there to replace our voice, but to help us find it. Models can help
provide structure and ideas that we can adapt to suit our own ends and
intentions.
We have to start
writing with our own vision of what we want to accomplish, and our own
sense of what is important and interesting. But that's just a jumping
off point. We need to focus these general interests and ideas into a
specific project.
Models can help
with this. We can look at other work that has dealt with the same subject;
in fact, as academics, we are obliged to do so, that's just basic research.
But to find our own voice, we start to look at these other works, and
we pick which ones resonate most strongly with us: which work best?
Which provide us with the most insight? Which are the best planned and
executed and written? Choosing among the possibilities helps us understand
what kind of research and writing we want to do.
We can also use
models to help us see what is accepted. When writing a dissertation,
looking at work that has been accepted at our school and by our dissertation
readers can provide insight into the quality of work that is expected
of us. This can both help us raise the quality of our work and avoid
delays caused by perfectionist tendencies. This second is worth noting
because many dissertation writers get bogged down trying to research
everything, and therefore it's probably useful to keep an eye on the
imperfections of our peers.
Possibly the best
kind of model that we can find is one that is almost a match for what
we want to do. Recently a client said to me "I found a study that's
almost exactly what I want to do, with one major exception. I'm worried
that I can't do what I wanted now." My thought was that this is a perfect
model. If you both see value in a work, and see how you would like to
do it differently, you have a great opportunity to both do innovative
academic work, and save yourself a lot of hassle. A close model could
provide almost an entire framework, and yet, by changing one major aspect
of that work to suit your interest, you would have a project that is
clearly distinct from the work you're modeling. The model defines a
niche in which your research fits, and the fact that your approach differs
means that you're just copying. The one major difference makes your
work your own. Of course you want to make sure that it really is a difference,
but if you can clearly see and clearly state what that distinction is,
you're in business.
When we use models
in academia, it's important to give credit where credit is due, and
to fully acknowledge our sources. And, as noted above, it's important
to be able to clearly explain what distinguishes your work from your
model. But beyond that care to cite our sources, this is largely the
nature of the academic process: we are all standing on the shoulders
of our predecessors; we all rely on the ideas of the academic culture
of which we are part. There is no shame in using a model, providing
we are consciously using and adapting that model into a form that expresses
our own voice.
Dave Harris,
Ph.D., academic writing coach and editor, helps writers rework their
writing process, fine-tune their final drafts, and everything in between
(www.thoughtclearing.com; dave@thoughtclearing.com).
Copyright © 2007, Dave Harris. All rights reserved
|